TheDissertation » Dissertation Discussion
What Is A Dissertation Discussion?
The dissertation discussion is a collective debate of any controversial or unresolved issue to establish the truth. The result of the debate should be a common opinion without disagreement. It is a question of creating the fact without a priori accepting one of the views as correct. It is always limited in time and requires careful preparation.
Discussion’s benefits are as follows: on the one hand, it reduces the moment of subjectivity, the beliefs of an individual or group of people in the debate are generally supported, hence an absolute validity. On the other hand, if it does not lead the participants to universal agreement, it necessarily promotes a better understanding of opponents.
The section discussing your manuscript may be one of the most difficult to write because it will require you to think about the meaning of the research you have done. A useful discussion section will tell the reader what your research means and why it is essential.
Briefly, your discussion is the answer to the question, “what do my results mean?” The manuscript discussion section should follow the “Methods and Results” section and precede the conclusion. It should have a direct bearing on the questions raised in your Introduction and consider your results in the context of the literature in your literature review. For your discussion section to be attractive, you should include the following information:
- The main findings of your research
- The meaning of these results
- How do these results relate to what others have done?
- Limitations on your results
- Explanation of any paradoxical, unexpected or inconclusive results
- Proposals for further research
Your discussion should not include the following information:
- New results or data not previously presented in the article
- Unreasonable reasoning
- Indirect issues
- Conclusions not supported by your data
Do you need an original paper?
Approach our writing company and get top-quality work written from scratch strictly on time!
Dissertation Discussion Chapter
The dissertation discussion chapter is the section that interprets the results presented in the article. Although the Introduction is shown in the article, methods, and effects, it is also necessary to understand the results for your audience. Thus, the “debate” section aims to answer the question, “so what?”. Explain the meaning of the results obtained and how they are related to the research problem you are working on.
The dissertation discussion section interprets the results of your research and draws conclusions or conclusions based on them. The purpose of the “debate” is to understand and explain the significance of your research results in light of what has already been discussed in the existing literature on this issue and explain new ideas about the problem based on your research findings.
Here are some of the tasks that the discussion section solves:
- discussion of the research question and the story of whether the answer was given in the research work based on the results;
- Highlight unexpected or exciting results and their relationship with the subject of research;
- Indication of previous studies and the difference between your education;
- Evidence of weaknesses, loopholes or limitations of the study;
- A recommendation on how analysis can be used to advance knowledge in your area.
Ways of Writing a Dissertation Discussion
There are several ways you can writing a dissertation discussion about your research in a useful, engaging, and relevant way. Most guidelines recommend listing the results of your study in descending order of importance. You would not want the reader to lose sight of the critical results you obtained, putting the essential findings in the foreground.
Imagine that you are conducting a study to evaluate the effectiveness of stent placement in patients with partial clogging of the arteries. You have found that, although this is a standard first-line treatment, stents are not effective in patients with partially blocked arteries. The study also found that asthma tends to develop more often in patients who have received treatment with a stent than those who have not received such treatment.
Which Proposal Would You Choose to Start the Discussion?
Our results showed that patients with partially occluded arteries who received a stent as a first-line intervention did not have better results than patients who did not undergo surgical treatment.
Our results showed that patients who received stents had a slightly higher asthma rate than patients who had not received such treatment. Furthermore, the placement of the stent did not affect the heart rate in a statistically significant way.
If you chose the first example, you’re right. If you are unsure which results are most important, go back to your research question and start with it. The most important finding is the one that answers the item in your research.
Dissertation Discussion Help
Do you need a dissertation discussion help? Then read this section carefully. Unlike the Introduction, where only generalized thematic information from well-developed scientific primary sources is provided, the literature review part of the Discussion of Results is aimed exclusively at the work of other scientists directly or indirectly related to the specific experimental data presented in the study. Moreover, in the author’s interpretation, they are directly related to the solution of specific scientific problems to achieve the goal of the study.
In the discussion section of a dissertation, additional argumentation, auxiliary empirical relations, and theoretical solutions that contribute to the correct perception of the results obtained by the author can be given. For persuasiveness, you can use drawings, diagrams, and constructions.
The analysis and discussion dissertation section is critical because it is in it that the main result of the article is presented, the novelty of the obtained scientific knowledge is formulated, and the direction of future work chosen by the author for further.
The presented recommendations for writing the section of the scientific article “Discussion of results” will help the student interpret his experimental material more effectively and prove the validity of the applied approach to the scientific goal of the conducted research. Such interpretation can be the basis for creating a new hypothesis or theory of describing the problem under study.
Dissertation Discussion Structure
Although there is no fixed dissertation discussion structure for writing the “debate” section, you can take a few simple steps to complete the “debate” section with a high impact on readers.
- Present a very brief summary of the central topic:
A right “Discussion” section extends the specific results to their broader meanings, which can then be linked to the general background provided in the Introduction to maximize the impact of the whole article. So, start “debate” by delivering the essential information already known about the topic of study.
- Interpret your results:
Discuss the meaning of your most valuable research findings with as much clarity as possible, because not all of your readers will understand the topic in depth. Discuss the relationships between observations: Do the results indicate a pattern, and can you summarize them? But do not try to impose an interpretation on your readers, but conduct an objective review of the results.
- Report the results of previous research:
A thorough literature search is mandatory before any research is conducted. Explain what is missing in previous studies and how your results are based on the results of those studies.
- Psychology dissertation discussion:
This is perhaps an essential part of the Discussion. The reader should clearly understand why your research is necessary. What contribution has research made to improve our understanding of a particular subject? It would help if you described your research contribution to existing knowledge and how it can stimulate future research.
- Specify the limitations of your research:
Indicate the limitations of your research; discuss issues that are not answered and have not been addressed in the study. Perhaps you could use another data collection method? Self-criticism and acceptance of the study’s limitations will show that you know it could not be covered.
- End with a message about what to look out for:
Some journals have a separate “Conclusion” section after “Discussion,” while others present the conclusion in the last paragraph of debate. You may be able to suggest a research perspective that would help remove any remaining doubts about the research issue or test a new hypothesis that might develop from your findings.
This is all you need to know about this concept. Adhere to the structure, and you will surely succeed!